Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This policy establishes the principles governing RMIT’s program and course lifecycle. Together with associated procedures and instructions, it encompasses design, development, approval (self-accreditation), reaccreditation, management, monitoring, review, discontinuation, changes to the national register of vocational education and training, and professional accreditation of programs, courses and non-award offerings. (2) RMIT is a self-accrediting university and Registered Training Organisation (RTO) offering Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) accredited and non-AQF programs and courses in Australia, at overseas campuses and domestic and international partner locations. (3) RMIT University is a CRICOS registered provider delivering programs to international students that hold or intend to hold a student visa whilst studying onshore in Australia. RMIT University Pathways (RMIT UP) is separately registered as a CRICOS registered provider. (4) Through this policy and related procedures, RMIT provides assurance that all offerings of programs, curriculum structure blocks, courses, units of learning and micro-credentials are designed and sequenced to support acquisition of knowledge, skills and their application in life and relevant work. (5) This policy, related procedures and guidance material sets out clearly articulated responsibilities, accountabilities and instruction for the approval and lifecycle management of all RMIT programs, courses and micro-credentials. (6) This policy applies to all award, preparatory and non-award programs, training products, courses, micro-credentials and units of competency offered by the (7) RMIT’s programs, courses and micro-credentials are designed, reviewed and approved to align with its curriculum architecture profile of a streamlined, adaptive, and high-quality suite of offerings to our communities. (8) All program and course offerings submitted for endorsement, approval and/or reaccreditation to the defined internal governance or accrediting agency are expected to comply with the Program and Course Policy provisions that are relevant to the type of offering. (9) RMIT programs and courses adhere to principles of best practice curriculum design, including the provision of equitable learning opportunities, appropriate learning support and access to reasonable adjustments where applicable. (10) Award programs and courses at RMIT: (11) New and amended RMIT programs and their structural components including courses, micro-credentials and units of learning are designed, delivered and reviewed in accordance with: (12) Programs and their structural components including courses, micro-credentials and units of learning are designed and delivered in accordance with relevant national qualifications frameworks, standards and requirements set by the Federal Register of Legislation: (13) Where a program is accredited by a professional body, colleges assure that it meets the professional accreditation standards. (14) Programs and their structural components, including courses, units of learning and micro-credentials are subject to continuing academic oversight, including regular monitoring, review and improvement by Academic Board and its sub-committees. Continuous improvement processes are informed by academic moderation, peer review, and benchmarking in accordance with RMIT defined frameworks, standards and requirements. (15) Staff involved in the design of programs, training products, courses, micro-credentials and units of learning are expected to maintain a high level of disciplinary and teaching and learning expertise, and exercise professional judgement in keeping with: (16) Academic Board is responsible for: (17) Vocational Education Committee is responsible for: (18) Higher Education Committee is responsible for: (19) Programs Committee is responsible for: (20) The Associate Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research Training and Development is responsible for: (21) Research Committee is responsible for: (22) RMIT UP Academic Quality Committee is responsible for: (23) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor Education is responsible for: (24) College Deputy Vice-Chancellors are responsible for: (25) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor Vocational Education is responsible for: (26) The Academic Registrar is responsible for maintaining the program and course procedures, processes and guidance materials for coursework programs and courses, including research components in coursework programs. (27) Staff who are responsible for the design, delivery, review, monitoring and administering of program and course offerings must follow this policy, procedures, schedules and supporting materials. (28) Breaches of this policy are managed via the Compliance Policy and the Compliance Breach Management Procedure. (29) This policy will be reviewed at least once every five years in accordance with the Policy Governance Framework. (30) Refer to the following documents which are established in accordance with this policy:Program and Course Policy
Section 1 - Purpose
Section 2 - Overview
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Policy
Principles
Responsibilities
Academic Board
Vocational education
Higher education
Higher degree by research
RMIT University Pathways (RMIT UP)
Deputy Vice-Chancellor Education
College Deputy Vice-Chancellor
Academic Registrar
Compliance
Review
Section 5 - Procedures and Resources
Top of PageSection 6 - Definitions
Accreditation
A type of quality assurance process under which programs, services and operations of educational institutions are evaluated by an external body or institutional governing body to determine if relevant standards are met. If standards are met, accredited status is granted by the appropriate agency. For RMIT, the relevant external regulatory bodies are the Tertiary Education Quality Standards Authority (TEQSA) for higher education and Foundation Studies, the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) for vocational education and training products, and the National ELICOS Accreditation Scheme (NEAS) for English language intensive programs. The relevant self-accrediting institutional bodies at RMIT are the Academic Board and the ASQA Delegation Panel.
Accredited course
A VET program that has been developed and independently assessed by ASQA or a State regulator to fill skills and knowledge gaps that are not covered by training packages. An accredited course (RMIT program) may lead to a qualification or a statement of attainment.
Award
A qualification that is conferred on a student upon successful completion of a program of study. Includes a degree, diploma, certificate, licence, honorary degree or other award.
Award program
A program that may lead to an award as defined by the policies and objectives of the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF).
Contextualisation
The adaptation of one or more elements in an offering to increase its cultural, personal, professional and global relevance to students.
Course
A unit of learning represented by a minimum of 12 credit points (or equivalent in VE and English Preparatory programs) that has more than one learning outcome and includes one or more assessment tasks. A course must have at least one course offering and may be undertaken as a component of a program.
Coursework program
A type of program that is not a higher degree by research (HDR) program focused on a single research project, but rather comprises a variety of courses each with several assessment tasks. Also, any course in a coursework program that is not a research component of an HDR program.
Credential
An abbreviated reference to a micro-credential. Refer to ‘Micro-credential’ for the full definition.
Curriculum structure block
Consistently sized units of learning with distinct credit point structures that when combined form a program.
CRICOS
Disciplinarity
Learning that spans disciplines incorporating but not exclusive of: Cross-disciplinarity: Parallel study undertaken in two or more disciplines (e.g. double major from two different disciplines) Inter-disciplinarity: Integrated study undertaken in two or more disciplines (e.g. combined degree). Trans-disciplinarity: Problem-based learning that spans two or more disciplines (e.g. combined degree with combined Industry Partnered Learning).
Disaggregation
A process in which the structural components (e.g. first year block/ major/ minor/ capstone/IPL/ micro-credentials) of a program are broken down into smaller components (e.g. unit of learning level) according to criteria (e.g. such as knowledge, skills, application of knowledge and skills, learning outcomes, assessments, activities) so that they can be reused or regrouped to form a new structural component (e.g. first year block/ major/ minor/ capstone/ IPL/ micro-credentials) or units of learning (e.g. 1CP or more).
Equivalence
A measure of quality determined by maintaining defined standards for capabilities and learning outcomes, work integrated learning (WIL), internationalisation strategies, teaching quality and management for all offerings of a single program or course.
Higher degree by research
A postgraduate degree that involves a student load comprising of two-thirds or more research and will either be a Master by Research (AQF level 9), or a Doctoral Degree (AQF level 10), or a Higher Doctorate degree.
Industry Embedded Activities (IEA)
Engagement with industry and community partners in the curriculum through activities that fall outside of Work Integrated Learning, such as guest industry/community lectures and panels, industry networking events, mentorships and joint research projects.
Industry Partnered Learning (IPL)
Embedding industry and connecting with professional communities in the curriculum structure. IPL experiences are designed in partnership with industry to be authentic and are a critical link between technical knowledge and the real world. IPL is made up of three components: work integrated learning (WIL), career development learning (CDL) and industry embedded activities.
Learning outcomes
The set of knowledge, skills and the application of the knowledge and skills a student is expected to have achieved in the courses (referred to as course learning outcomes) and in their program (referred to as program learning outcomes) on successful completion.
Micro-credential
A certification, usually in the form of a digital badge, that assesses learning or competency, with a minimum volume of learning of one hour and less than an AQF award qualification, that is additional, alternate, or complementary to an AQF award qualification. Learning products referred to as ‘micro-credential’ or ‘credential’ are recognised collectively at RMIT as a ‘micro-credential’ for this definition and for all policy, governance, and approval pathways.
Non-award program
A program that enables students to enrol in courses or micro-credentials but which does not lead to a qualification.
Preparatory program
A program designed to prepare students for further study in tertiary education.
Professional accreditation
Granted to programs of study that have been assessed by and meet the knowledge and skills competencies required by the granting professional body. Professional accreditation status of a program of study may be required for a graduate to be eligible to practice within that profession, also known as statutory accreditation.
Program
A curriculum of study that provides a structured approach for a student to achieve defined learning outcomes that may lead to one or more awards and must have at least one offering.
Program offering
An instance of a program that is offered at a specific location or offered via a specific delivery mode.
Qualification
A formal certification that will substantiate the achievement of all learning outcomes of an accredited program by a graduate.
Re-accreditation
A process designed to ensure that the program of study continues to meet all quality assurance measures put in place by the provider, remains a viable program of study and fits with the overarching aims and goals of the provider. RMIT reaccredits programs, in its self-accrediting capacity, utilising the academic scrutiny conducted through the Comprehensive Program Review process ensuring the program of study continues to meet regulatory requirements. May also be described as reapproval.
Scope of registration
The VET qualifications, accredited courses and units of competency that an RTO has been registered to deliver and assess. Recorded on the National Register of VET.
Self-accreditation
Where a registered tertiary education provider is permitted by the appropriate Agency to accredit (approve), via its internal governing body, some or all of its programs of study.
Short course
A course that does not feature an assessment nor contribute credit points towards a program and is not recorded on an academic transcript. Students who complete a short course are provided with an RMIT Certificate of Completion.
Skill set
One or more VET units of competency on RMIT’s scope of registration that have been bundled together to address a specific industry need or specific licensing/regulatory requirement recognised through a Statement of Attainment.
Structural components
The units of learning, micro-credentials and blocks in the form of first year, capabilities, capstones, minors and/or majors that form a program.
Training package
A curriculum document for VET in relation to an industry, endorsed by an Industry or Skills Council, which defines qualifications, units of competency, assessment requirements for each unit of competency, and credit arrangements.
Training product
A VET program that may include an AQF qualification, skill set, unit of competency, accredited course or module.
Unit of competency
A unit of study that will provide a student with a volume of learning and will have specified performance criteria, elements, foundational skills and will include one or more assessment tasks defined through the required performance evidence, knowledge evidence and assessment conditions and may be undertaken as a component of a program.
Unit of learning
A measurement of learning using credit points and must be at least 1 credit point minimum.