Bulletin Board - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this
to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will receive a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments, take a note of where you up to and return later to make a further submission.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
-
If you would like a copy of the comments you made via the Bulletin Board, please email policy@rmit.edu.au and specify which document you provided feedback on and a copy of your submission will be emailed to you.
(1) The procedure outlines the requirements for staff across RMIT and its controlled entities to establish and manage research funding in accordance with the Research Policy. It ensures: (2) All research funding activities must align with RMIT’s ethics, integrity, sustainability and conflict of interest frameworks. Where a potential agreement may present ethical or reputational risks to RMIT, additional information must be sought before proceeding. This may require enhanced due diligence and, where appropriate, escalation through formal approval processes (e.g. escalation to the Risk team or Foreign Relations team) (3) This procedure is established under the Research Policy and aligns with the Financial Management Policy and Delegation of Authority Policy. (4) This procedure applies to all staff, students, visiting researchers, and honorary and adjunct appointees undertaking or supporting research at RMIT or its controlled entities and external research locations RMIT is obliged to consider. References to external research funding include competitive proposals, direct engagements with external partners, commissioned research and other approved external funding arrangements that support research activity. (5) Research Funding activities must be managed in accordance with the Contract Management Policy and approved delegations and governance requirements. Where research activity is supported through a gift instrument or other philanthropic funding arrangement, relevant University gift acceptance, donor due diligence and governance requirements must also be considered. (6) All approvals and key decisions relating to Research Contracts must be recorded in nominated University systems, which act as the official system of record. (7) Appropriate separation of duties must be maintained between approval, financial management, and oversight responsibilities and comply with the Conflict of Interest Policy. (8) All proposed external research funding sources will be consistent with RMIT’s values, strategic objectives and commitment to ethical, responsible and sustainable research, including consideration of environmental, social and governance (ESG), research integrity, reputational risk, prohibited-source and University governance requirements in accordance with RMIT’s Sustainability Policy and Corporate Social Responsibility Due Diligence Instruction, and alignment with RMIT’s Research Security Framework. (9) RMIT will not accept funding from the tobacco industry for research, nor promote or advertise any research funding opportunities from the tobacco industry. (10) All external research funding opportunities, proposals or arrangements must: (11) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) due diligence must be undertaken prior to engagement with a research partner, to assess ethical, reputational and governance risks. (12) Financial onboarding of Research Partners is governed by the Revenue Contracts and Debtors Procedure, including credit assessment requirements, materiality thresholds and exemptions. Where a payment cannot be secured upfront, or a partner has an existing outstanding debt, appropriate approval must be obtained from the relevant Financial Delegate to accept any associated financial risk. Where the arrangement is governed by a gift instrument or similar donor arrangement, applicable University gift acceptance and donor due diligence requirements must also be considered. (13) A risk assessment must be considered for all funded research, including consideration of financial risk, delivery risk, partner risk and termination risk. Risk assessment should also consider the potential for partner withdrawal, milestone dispute or early termination, including whether staff, student or other committed costs may exceed funding received or contractually recoverable amounts. (14) Lead Researchers must ensure the full cost of research is accurately reflected in the relevant funding documentation, including proposals, budgets, contracts, partner agreements or other approved funding records, in accordance with applicable University costing, pricing, financial governance and competitive neutrality requirements. (15) Risk assessments and budgets must be developed with active input from the Lead Researcher, either through available support tools or, where feasible, with support from relevant specialist teams. Lead Researchers provide the project-specific technical expertise and delivery assumptions required to inform scope, risk and budget development, while professional and central teams provide and maintain supporting tools, advice and compliance review. (16) Where HERDC reportable research income is anticipated, the project scope, agreement, budget and supporting documentation must be sufficient to demonstrate that the funded activity meets the applicable HERDC research definition and reporting criteria. Classification of funding as research funding for internal management purposes does not automatically mean the income is HERDC reportable. HERDC reportability must be assessed separately against the applicable reporting requirements. (17) Where appropriate, payment schedules, milestone acceptance processes and termination provisions should be reviewed to mitigate financial exposure to RMIT, including recovery of committed costs. (18) A research project must not commence, and expenditure must not be incurred, until all the following conditions are met: (19) The Lead Researcher is responsible for ensuring: (20) Finance will prepare and issue all research invoices in accordance with the contract terms. (22) Where required, variations to project scope, budget or timelines must; (23) Internal funding towards an external research project must only be used for its approved purpose unless otherwise approved by the relevant financial delegate (24) Honorary researchers must nominate an eligible RMIT staff member to undertake the Project Manager role for financial management purposes, with School approval. (25) External research income must not be transferred or distributed between project records. Only income specified in the Research Contract may be allocated to a project record and must be recorded against the applicable Higher Education Research Data Collection research sub-category. (26) The Lead Researcher must: (27) Awards Management may provide support as required to confirm contractual obligations have been met and are responsible for closing a project record in RMIT's research administration system. (28) Finance is responsible for: (29) Where surplus funds remain: (30) Unspent internal contributions will not be carried forward beyond project closure. (31) Research customer invoices are subject to 30-day payment terms. (32) The Lead Researcher must: (33) Where there is a risk that an invoice will not be paid: (34) Finance will manage all accounting associated with debt recovery processes. Support from the Lead Researcher and/or Legal may be required, including for provisioning and write-off, in accordance with applicable policy. Financial delegate approval is required for write-off (e.g. Dean or Dean equivalent) (35) The relevant College delegate will receive periodic reporting on outstanding research debts. Research-related invoices must be monitored, reviewed and escalated through appropriate University financial governance processes, having regard to the age and materiality of the debt, likelihood of recovery, contractual position and broader partner risk. Finance will coordinate the debt recovery process, with input from the Lead Researcher, Research and Innovation, Research Contracts or Legal Services, and relevant College representatives where required. (36) Where a partner terminates or indicates an intention to terminate a funded research arrangement, Research and Innovation, Research Contracts/Legal and Finance should be consulted to assess contractual recovery options, revenue received, committed costs, forecast residual deficit and the required approval pathway for any unfunded exposure. Any residual deficit or unfunded exposure must be assessed, documented and approved in accordance with the relevant financial delegations, including confirmation of the proposed funding source or treatment. (37) This section applies to customer invoices issued by RMIT and overdue amounts owed to RMIT. Gift-related commitments should be managed in accordance with applicable University processes and any governing gift instrument, unless the arrangement includes invoicing, contractual payment features or other enforceable payment obligations requiring Finance debtor management. (38) Internal Research Funds (IRF) projects are established to manage internal research funding allocations. (40) Expenditure within IRFs must: (41) Unspent funds may not be carried forward unless explicitly approved. (42) Where IRF balances are subject to specific approved funding terms, expenditure and any approved carry-forward must be managed consistently with those terms and relevant financial governance requirements. (43) Research Contracts are subject to internal and external compliance, audit, and assurance requirements. Where applicable (44) Finance is responsible for coordinating audit activities. (45) The Lead Researcher must: (46) All project records must: (47) Failure to comply with audit and assurance requirements may result in:Research Funding Procedure
Section 1 - Purpose
Section 2 - Authority
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Procedure
Governance, Roles and Responsibilities
Research Funding Sources
Pre-Award and Due Diligence
Establishing a Funded Research Project
Managing a Funded Research Project
Completing a Funded Research Project
Research Debts, Partner Termination and Financial Risk Management
Internal Research Funds
Compliance, Audit and Assurance
Top of PageSection 5 - Definitions